Canon Powershot SX 230 SH Zoom resolution comparison

The SX230 has 14x magnification, I’m curious how this feature will translate to actual per inch pixel size at some reasonable vertical distance to give me a good starting point before I strap in the camera to my fixed wing for some real tests.

For my test, I took pictures at 0%, 20% and 50% optical zoom from height of about 100m.   I have 2 objectives: to get a good inch per pixel estimate and second, to get the approximate ‘footprint’ or area of the image of each zoom rate.

SHOT 1:  Unprocessed 0% zoom rate:

Canon sx230 at 0 perc zoom 100m
Canon sx230 at 0 perc zoom 100m

SHOT 2: Unprocessed 20% zoom rate:

Canon sx230 at 20 perc zoom 100m
Canon sx230 at 20 perc zoom 100m

SHOT 3: Unprocessed 50% zoom rate:

Canon sx230 at 50 perc zoom 100m
Canon sx230 at 50 perc zoom 100m

SHOT 1A:  pixel at 0% zoom rate:

Canon sx230 at 0 perc zoom 100m
Canon sx230 at 0 perc zoom 100m

SHOT 2A: pixel at 20% zoom rate:

Canon sx230 at 20 perc zoom 100m
Canon sx230 at 20 perc zoom 100m

SHOT 3A: pixel at 50% zoom rate:

Canon sx230 at 50 perc zoom 100m
Canon sx230 at 50 perc zoom 100m

Summary:

1)  0 and 20% zoom does not have any real footprint difference.
2)  0 and 20% zoom has a good sized foot print from 100m and probably will do for aerial mapping purposes which requires 3-6 inch pixel resolution.
3) 50% zoom actually has only 25% of the footprint of 0% zoom (not 50%!) however, the resolution is good, I suspect less than 1 inch per pixel as shown in shot 3A.
4) Finally 100m is too low for real aerial mapping work, 400m-700m is probably more appropriate.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *